Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Chart: SDS

Courtesy of TradeStation.com
NOTE: watch your charts near the Picasso high and low dates.  The buy and sell signals in the chart above is evidence of this strategy.

Keep following JustSignals using Twitter, @StockTwits or Follow By Email. 
Just submit your email address in the box on the Blog homepage
This has been posted for Educational Purposes Only.   Do your own work and consult with Professionals before making any investment decisions.  
Past performance is not indicative of future results


Sunday, February 21, 2016

What's Picasso saying ?

Picasso is not displaying any swings going forward for the DJIA.  So it is not easy to interpret a near flat line with an upward bias.  But, GE is the only stock left in the Dow30 that is one of the original DJIA stocks.  Although the price charts of GE & the DJIA are not similar, their changes in trend have been similar in the past.  Due to this similar trend between GE & the DJIA, it is best that Picasso's readings for GE be used temporarily as a proxy for the DJIA. So here are those results.

Picasso's dates
2/22H
2/25-28L
3/1-2H
3/15L


Keep following JustSignals using Twitter, @StockTwits or Follow By Email. 
Just submit your email address in the box on the Blog homepage
This has been posted for Educational Purposes Only.   Do your own work and consult with Professionals before making any investment decisions.  
Past performance is not indicative of future results

Thursday, February 18, 2016

RYNVX another extreme reading

Last posted on January 19,2016
Updates in BLUE - RYNVX inched closer to another extreme reading

RYFXX - Rydex US Government Money Market
RYNVX - Rydex Nova Fund Investor Class (Long Fund)
RYURX -  Rydex Inverse S&P 500® Strategy Fund Investor Class (Inverse Fund)

RYFXX   3-10-09   $1,367Mil   3-10-15   $655Mil     9-9-15    $1,434Mil
                                                                                 9-14-15   $1,451Mil    
                                                                               10-26-15     $862Mil
RYNVX    3-11-09  $22Mil     5-14-15  $177Mil          9-4-15       $53Mil 
                                                                                    9-14-15      $52Mil
                                                                                  10-26-15    $140Mil
                                                                                  11/27/15     $182Mil
                                                                                  12/10/15     $187Mil
                                                                                  12/29/15     $189Mil
                                                                                   1/15/16        $51Mil
                                                                                   1/19/16        $37Mil
                                                                                   2/18/16        $37Mil
RYURX   3-9-09        $353Mil   5-4-15   $58.34Mil      9-9-15    $148Mil
                                                                                    9-14-15   $172Mil
                                                                                  10-26-15   $117Mil

Note  The RYNVX is now near another potential extreme.  It is currently at $37Mil again which is $152Mil less than the $189Mil recorded on 12/29/15 before the January & February market correction and only $15Mil more than the $22Mil recorded on 3/11/09...
***Also note that it is currently at the same $37Mil that was also recorded on 1/19/16 at the January low....

*If this maybe a hint that a turn in the market is near and it turns out to be correct, we then understand why the Buying Pressure chart has been giving another positive divergence indication.  Looking for a buildup of more evidence.

This low dollar amount in the RYNVX long fund displays fear in the market...

Keep following JustSignals using Twitter, @StockTwits or Follow By Email. 
Just submit your email address in the box on the Blog homepage
This has been posted for Educational Purposes Only.   Do your own work and consult with Professionals before making any investment decisions.  
Past performance is not indicative of future results

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Stanley Druckenmiller

The Greatest Money Manager Alive Attributes The Majority His Success To Just This One Thing

 

The Felder Report



 
By Jesse Felder
 
An excerpt from the article
 
 


Link to article

https://www.thefelderreport.com/2016/01/07/the-greatest-money-manager-alive-attributes-the-majority-his-success-to-just-this-one-thing/

Keep following JustSignals using Twitter, @StockTwits or Follow By Email.  Just submit your email address in the box on the Blog homepage This has been posted for Educational Purposes Only.   Do your own work and consult with Professionals before making any investment decisions.   Past performance is not indicative of future results

Saturday, February 13, 2016

Marty Zweig can still teach us now

NOTE: Interesting that the last post was on the Inverted Yield Curve.
You will understand when you read this article.

What Marty Zweig can teach us now

Published: Mar 1, 2013 6:01 a.m. ET

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Last week came the sad news that Martin Zweig had died at the absurdly young age of 70.
Many tributes to him (which included an insightful commentary by Mark Hulbert in MarketWatch) recalled his memorable appearance on Wall Street Week with Louis Rukeyser on Fri., Oct. 16, 1987 where he warned of a stock market crash. It happened the following Monday, and Zweig’s reputation as a forecaster was sealed.

Read Hulbert’s commentary on Martin Zweig.
 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-tribute-to-zweigs-many-contributions-2013-02-19

You can watch the video here, starting about six minutes in.
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MyToTwag34

Still, that understates his importance. A numbers wizard (he got a PhD in finance from Michigan State), Zweig saw patterns in the market no one else could. His newsletter, The Zweig Forecast, had a stellar track record, according to Hulbert, and he ran a successful hedge fund with his business partner Joseph DiMenna. Zweig, who famously purchased a multistory penthouse apartment in New York City’s Pierre Hotel for a record $21.5 million in 1999, had a net worth estimated in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

But he also had a simple philosophy that can help ordinary people navigate even the most treacherous markets. By sticking to it, investors can participate in the upside while limiting downside risk. Many people claim to have done that, but Zweig actually did.
I interviewed him back in the late 1980s as a much-younger reporter at a small, feisty business paper in Miami, where he spent some of his formative years. He didn’t give many interviews (and none I could find recently), but he was gracious and his passion for investing was evident. I recently re-read his first book, “Winning on Wall Street,” originally published in 1986. The many statistics are dated, but the insights are timeless.
Zweig’s nostrums are well known — “Don’t fight the Fed,” “don’t fight the tape” — but they shouldn’t be taken for granted. Used correctly, they’re a recipe for making money and reducing risk.

 ‘Don’t fight the Fed’
“Monetary conditions exert an enormous influence on stock prices,” he wrote in “Winning on Wall Street.”
“Indeed, the monetary climate—primarily the trend in interest rates and Federal Reserve policy—is the dominant factor in determining the stock market’s major direction.”
“Generally a rising trend in rates is bearish for stocks; a falling trend is bullish,” he continued.

 Why? For two reasons. “First, falling interest rates reduce the competition on stocks from other investments, especially short-term instruments such as Treasury bills, certificates of deposit, or money market funds,” he wrote.
“Second, when interest rates fall, it costs corporations less to borrow. As expenses fall, profits rise…So, as interest rates drop, investors tend to bid prices higher, partly on the expectation of better earnings.”
Isn’t that exactly what’s happened now? After resisting for years while the Fed drove real short-term interest rates below zero, investors have jumped back into US stock mutual funds and ETFs.
Read Gold’s analysis of why investors are buying ETFs but not stocks on MoneyShow.com.
And companies have zealously controlled their expenses and have refinanced every bit of debt they could at rock-bottom rates. No wonder corporate profits are at their highest percentage of GDP in more than 60 years.
‘Don’t fight the tape’
“Big money is made in the stock market by being on the right side of the major moves,” he wrote. “The idea is to get in harmony with the market. It’s suicidal to fight trends. They have a higher probability of continuing than not…Strong momentum tends to persist…Fighting the tape is an open invitation to disaster.”
Zweig advised investors not to go all in or out, but to keep a position in stocks and increase it when the risk was low while reducing it when the risk was high. “What you are concerned with is the probability of success or, alternatively, the probability of losing money. You want to avoid loss. So, it’s fine to buy above the bottom and to sell below the top,” he wrote.
How do we know if we’re near a top? Start with the Fed, of course. When rates are low, as they are now, the second of two rate hikes or a one-percentage-point increase in the prime rate would trigger a Zweig sell signal.
Would the end of “quantitative easing” constitute a rate hike? Good question, but I doubt it. That means we probably don’t have to worry about a monetary sell signal until at least 2014.

Zweig found that every bear market from 1919 to 1982 had at least one of three conditions: extreme deflation; “ultrahigh” price/earnings ratios in the upper teens and twenties, or an inverted yield curve, where short-term interest rates exceed long-term rates.

Seen any of those lately? Not in this galaxy.
We live in confusing times — slow economic growth, the aftermath of a major financial crisis, ballooning national debt and the loosest monetary policy the Fed has ever pursued. But that loose policy has staved off deflation and the inverted yield curve that often precedes recessions — two of Zweig’s critical indicators for bear markets.
Far too many investors have been paralyzed by fear during the current four-year bull market, while the key signs that Zweig and others (like Jim Stack) look at have been persistently bullish.

And too many people have stayed away because they were afraid of fiscal cliffs or sequesters or Europe or were philosophically opposed to the Fed’s easy money policy.
That’s fine — I don’t like the Fed’s policy, either. But when the Federal Reserve — in Zweig’s words, “the dominant factor in determining the market’s major direction” — is giving away stock market profits, do you really want to sit on the sidelines out of principle? That’s crazy.

 Marty Zweig believed that flexibility was the most important trait of successful investors — their ability to apply core precepts to fluid markets and change their minds when conditions warranted. It’s a shame this great thinker is no longer with us, but he left a road map of how it can be done, if only we focused on the right things.

Keep following JustSignals using Twitter, @StockTwits or Follow By Email.  Just submit your email address in the box on the Blog homepage This has been posted for Educational Purposes Only.  Do your own work and consult with Professionals before making any investment decisions.   Past performance is not indicative of future results

Friday, February 12, 2016

Inverted Yield Curve


What is an inverted yield curve?
Simply put, the yield curve shows the relationship between short-term interest rates and those for longer-term debt. Typically, investors demand higher rates for the increased risk of holding bonds or other debt instruments for longer periods, which means the yield curve slopes upward.
When the difference between short and long rates narrows, the curve starts flattening. And when short-term rates move higher than intermediate and longer rates, the normal pattern is reversed, or inverted.

What does it tell us?
The yield curve is an important gauge of economic and financial market health. When the slope of the curve steepens, it signals that investors – and businesses – are more confident about acquiring assets other than safe government bonds in an improving economy.
A flattening curve is a sign that investors are losing confidence in the growth story. And when it inverts, investors are battening down the hatches in expectation of future storms.

What does an inverted curve mean for the economy?
Nothing good. Inversions have preceded the past seven recessions, typically by about a year to 18 months. When the curve flattens or inverts, trouble is usually lurking in the neighborhood in the form of more costly financing for banks and other companies that typically borrow their money at short-term rates. It also means lower returns for pension funds and other investors that need to hold longer-term bonds. And even if the economy manages to muddle through, slower growth will translate into reduced corporate profits and lower returns for equity investors.

Comments by JustSignals
 Ok, so why post this?  This week the Chairperson Yellen of the Federal Reserve was asked about Negative Interest Rates (NIRP) and if the Fed was considering NIRP.  Yellen said that the Fed looked into NIRP during 2010 and that they were looking into it again now.  Not that NIRP was on the table, but, it is not off the table either.

Over the last 10+ years investors have been buying up US Treasury Bonds and thereby pushing down the yield on those Bonds.  Investors will do this as a flight to quality.  So, is the long term rates eventually going to be lower than the short term rates?   If Investors keep buying up those US Treas Bonds like they have been, maybe. Especially since the Fed just raised interest rates by 1/4 point those the rate spreads will get pretty tight.

So is this one of the reasons the Fed is considering NIRP?   
To keep the yield curve from inverting by manipulating it ?
To keep kicking the can down the road some more ?

If it is, now we should understand why NIRP has not worked in other countries and will probably not work here too.
The Currency Wars continue.


Keep following JustSignals using Twitter, @StockTwits or Follow By Email.  Just submit your email address in the box on the Blog homepage This has been posted for Educational Purposes Only.  Do your own work and consult with Professionals before making any investment decisions.   Past performance is not indicative of future results
 





Wednesday, February 10, 2016

GLD chart

Courtesy of eSignal


Keep following JustSignals using Twitter, @StockTwits or Follow By Email.  Just submit your email address in the box on the Blog homepage This has been posted for Educational Purposes Only.  Do your own work and consult with Professionals before making any investment decisions.   Past performance is not indicative of future results





SPY chart update

The following chart of SPY was prepared on Feb 5,2016.
Note the Comments on the chart.

Courtesy of eSignal
The following chart of SPY was updated today once a similar pattern in the chart above appeared to be repeating again.

Courtesy of eSignal
As you can see the price pattern in the Feb 5th chart appears to be repeating in today's chart.
There are no guarantees that it will turn out the same way, but, it might.  So watch it carefully.


For additional information see the following charts of the DIA and the SPY using ChaikinAnalytics.com

Courtesy of ChaikinAnalytics.com
Courtesy of ChaikinAnalytics.com
Note the similar patterns that are developing in these two charts.   One might expect that the OB/OS indicator may drift lower into the empty green circle on the bottom right of each chart.  If the pattern does repeat itself, this should happen late this week or early to mid week, next week.

Keep following JustSignals using Twitter, @StockTwits or Follow By Email.  Just submit your email address in the box on the Blog homepage This has been posted for Educational Purposes Only.  Do your own work and consult with Professionals before making any investment decisions.   Past performance is not indicative of future results

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

CoCos

Courtesy of Bloomberg QuickTake

Contingent Convertibles

High-Yield Hand Grenades


It’s a high-yield investment with a hand grenade attached. A security carried gingerly with the hope that it won’t explode, leaving investors in a hole. Welcome to a class of securities that’s all the rage in Europe: contingent convertibles, also known as CoCo bonds. A cross between a bond and a stock, a new type of CoCo is helping banks bolster capital to meet tougher regulation designed to prevent a repeat of the taxpayer bailouts of the financial crisis. Many investors are skeptical that the extra yield they offer really reflects the dangers of a blowup – no one really knows how bad the fallout would be because the trigger has never been pulled. While CoCos are supposed to make financial markets safer, there’s a question about whether regulators may have unwittingly created new and untested risks.

Link to the full article
 bv.ms/1FvseYi

Keep following JustSignals using Twitter, @StockTwits or Follow By Email.  Just submit your email address in the box on the Blog homepage This has been posted for Educational Purposes Only.  Do your own work and consult with Professionals before making any investment decisions.   Past performance is not indicative of future results

Friday, February 5, 2016

charts: DIA, QQQ, SPY, IWM

Note the yellow highlighted areas on each of the following charts.  Similar patterns were highlighted.
"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme" - Mark Twain

Courtesy of ChaikinAnalytics.com



Courtesy of ChaikinAnalytics.com
Courtesy of ChaikinAnalytics.com


Courtesy of ChaikinAnalytics.com
The stock indices are short term overbought and so are many stocks.  On the January 20th bottom many indicators were in oversold areas indicating a bottom.  At this point the short term is OB and the intermediate term is OS.  If you saw the post on "SPY Chart Discussion" it is possible that the 1/20 bottom may be tested and probably during the dates Picasso suggested. (see Picasso post)   But it is not necessary to work off this short term OB current status, but, it would help and be healthy for the intermediate term to then advance from it's OS condition.
If this scenario turns out to be correct, then it will be following the Average Election Years.  This chart can be found in a prior posting on this blog.

Keep following JustSignals using Twitter, @StockTwits or Follow By Email.  Just submit your email address in the box on the Blog homepage This has been posted for Educational Purposes Only.   Do your own work and consult with Professionals before making any investment decisions.   Past performance is not indicative of future results

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Don't Forget the SuperBowl Indicator

Super Bowl theory of the stock market was originally proposed by New York Times sportswriter Leonard Koppett in 1978. He simply stated that in 10 out of 11 years, the direction of the stock market was foretold by the outcome of the Super Bowl. Koppett observed that if an old (pre-merger) NFL team won the Super Bowl, the market closed higher for the year, and if an old AFL team won, the market closed down for the year. 

 Keep following JustSignals using Twitter, @StockTwits or Follow By Email.  Just submit your email address in the box on the Blog homepage This has been posted for Educational Purposes Only.   Do your own work and consult with Professionals before making any investment decisions.   Past performance is not indicative of future results

SPY chart discussion


The following is a chart of the SPY


Courtesy of eSignal


There are multiple things going on and now is probably the best time to discuss them.
Picasso expects a high in the area of 2/6-8 and a low in the area of 2/11-16.
In the chart above you can see that a bearish impulse wave is labeled from the 11/3 high and currently it is trying to complete wave 4.  If this wave count is correct, then we should expect wave 5 to form with a drop below the 181.02 low made on 1/20.  This scenario including the wave count and the Picasso dates seem to fit well.  Now we just have to wait until the blue bars turn red and one bar closes below 185.70 (as of today, this price may change over time).  in addition, it would also help to see a crossover of the blue & red lines in the bottom widow.
If this does happen this way, it would also be following the Average Election Year Price Pattern that you can review again on this Blog on Jan 13th.   You will then see that the Average Election Year Price Pattern indicates that after a February bottom develops, the market could possibly rally into April +/-.   As we get closer to that time frame Picasso will be consulted so the cycle dates can be checked and compared, but, first we have to get through February.

Keep following JustSignals using Twitter, @StockTwits or Follow By Email.  Just submit your email address in the box on the Blog homepage This has been posted for Educational Purposes Only.   Do your own work and consult with Professionals before making any investment decisions.   Past performance is not indicative of future results


Picasso Says...


The chart below, nicknamed "Picasso", shows the new forecast cycle dates.





Keep following JustSignals using Twitter, @StockTwits or Follow By Email. 
Just submit your email address in the box on the Blog homepage
This has been posted for Educational Purposes Only.   Do your own work and consult with Professionals before making any investment decisions.  
Past performance is not indicative of future results

Monday, February 1, 2016

Barron's Confidence Index

Courtesy of Barron's
As they say, A Picture is Worth A Thousand Words.
Take a look, a close look.  Study this. 
There is a message here.


Keep following JustSignals using Twitter, @StockTwits or Follow By Email. 
Just submit your email address in the box on the Blog homepage
This has been posted for Educational Purposes Only.   Do your own work and consult with Professionals before making any investment decisions.  
Past performance is not indicative of future results